A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > 200mm vs 300mm comparison...

Featured Equipment Deals

The Fine Art of Dog Photography: An Interview with Sophie Gamand Read More

The Fine Art of Dog Photography: An Interview with Sophie Gamand

Sophie Gamand, a French fine art photographer based in New York City, takes absolutely charming photos of dogs. Join us as we talk about finding her niche as a fine art photographer, her award-winning...

Latest Equipment Articles

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs Read More

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs

Photo packs have come a long way in the past decade, especially those that are targeted toward outdoor and adventure photographers. Alaska-based adventure photographer Dan Bailey takes a closer look...

Latest Learning Articles

Getting Started in Video Read More

Getting Started in Video

Photographer Ted Kawalerski made the transition from still to motion and has never looked back. Ted takes you through the steps to get started in a medium that will open your photography business to...


200mm vs 300mm comparison photos

Sean Breadsell , Jan 11, 2009; 09:52 p.m.

A mate asked me what the difference would be between a 200mm and a 300mm on a DX camera, I told him with the crop factor its basically 300mm vs 450mm.
But thats not enough for him to appreciate it and I don't have a 300mm to show him. Is there somebody out there that can take a couple of sample images, one at 200mm and then one at 300mm to show him the difference.....thanks

Responses

Shun Cheung , Jan 11, 2009; 09:56 p.m.

Matthew Brennan , Jan 11, 2009; 10:02 p.m.

200mm vs 300mm


200mm vs 300mm taken from the same spot

Ronald Moravec , Jan 11, 2009; 10:07 p.m.

Take 1/3 off the width and length of the 200 mm photo. Picture wise they will be exactly the same with a quality loss for the crop.

Jay Chadney , Jan 12, 2009; 04:56 p.m.

I have been re-tnhinking my bag an if I should get a teleconverter or not.
I have/had several lenses that I was trying to narrow down.

  • sigma 70-200/2.8
  • nikon 80-200/2.8 afs
  • sigma 100-300/4
  • tamron adaptall 300/2.8 with 1.4tc

I took several shots at different apertures. When comparing the results, I compared all 3 zooms at 300mm (i cropped the results from the 2 shorter zooms), then I compared the winner of that contest to the adaptall lens (with cropping the shorter one again)

My results: the Nikon 80-200 afs gives me the best results when cropped to 300mm - better than the 100-300 with zero cropping.
Then came testing the 80-200 afs cropped to 420mm against the manual focus prime lens. That test was very close. It seems I can push my Nikon quite a ways!

James Burke , Jan 22, 2009; 08:18 a.m.

You can also throw a teleconverter on the 80-200 and get the better zoom without much of a loss in quality. Doesn't work well with the 2.0 TC though.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses