A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > 200mm vs 300mm comparison...

Featured Equipment Deals

King Sized Portrait Lighting: Going Big Read More

King Sized Portrait Lighting: Going Big

Pro portrait photographer and Craftsy instructor, Kirk Tuck, shares his very favorite way to light a portrait.

Latest Equipment Articles

Choosing a Mobile Photo Printer Read More

Choosing a Mobile Photo Printer

In today's mobile, digital world, we carry hundreds or even thousands of pictures around on our smartphones and tablets. Tom Persinger looks at 4 different mobile photo printer options for getting...

Latest Learning Articles

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial) Read More

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial)

Building upon last week's Basic Printing with Lightroom video tutorial, this advanced printing tutorial will teach you to print contact sheets, print multiple images at a time, use Lightroom's present...


200mm vs 300mm comparison photos

Sean Breadsell , Jan 11, 2009; 09:52 p.m.

A mate asked me what the difference would be between a 200mm and a 300mm on a DX camera, I told him with the crop factor its basically 300mm vs 450mm.
But thats not enough for him to appreciate it and I don't have a 300mm to show him. Is there somebody out there that can take a couple of sample images, one at 200mm and then one at 300mm to show him the difference.....thanks

Responses

Shun Cheung , Jan 11, 2009; 09:56 p.m.

Matthew Brennan , Jan 11, 2009; 10:02 p.m.

200mm vs 300mm


200mm vs 300mm taken from the same spot

Ronald Moravec , Jan 11, 2009; 10:07 p.m.

Take 1/3 off the width and length of the 200 mm photo. Picture wise they will be exactly the same with a quality loss for the crop.

Jay Chadney , Jan 12, 2009; 04:56 p.m.

I have been re-tnhinking my bag an if I should get a teleconverter or not.
I have/had several lenses that I was trying to narrow down.

  • sigma 70-200/2.8
  • nikon 80-200/2.8 afs
  • sigma 100-300/4
  • tamron adaptall 300/2.8 with 1.4tc

I took several shots at different apertures. When comparing the results, I compared all 3 zooms at 300mm (i cropped the results from the 2 shorter zooms), then I compared the winner of that contest to the adaptall lens (with cropping the shorter one again)

My results: the Nikon 80-200 afs gives me the best results when cropped to 300mm - better than the 100-300 with zero cropping.
Then came testing the 80-200 afs cropped to 420mm against the manual focus prime lens. That test was very close. It seems I can push my Nikon quite a ways!

James Burke , Jan 22, 2009; 08:18 a.m.

You can also throw a teleconverter on the 80-200 and get the better zoom without much of a loss in quality. Doesn't work well with the 2.0 TC though.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses