A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Nikon SLRs > Anyone using Leica R lenses on...

Featured Equipment Deals

Basic Photo Tips: Aperture, Shutter Speed, and ISO Read More

Basic Photo Tips: Aperture, Shutter Speed, and ISO

Just as it was 100 years ago and just as it is today, every camera—be it film or digital—is nothing more than a lightproof box with a lens at one end and light sensitive film or a digital...

Latest Equipment Articles

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs Read More

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs

Photo packs have come a long way in the past decade, especially those that are targeted toward outdoor and adventure photographers. Alaska-based adventure photographer Dan Bailey takes a closer look...

Latest Learning Articles

Getting Started in Video Read More

Getting Started in Video

Photographer Ted Kawalerski made the transition from still to motion and has never looked back. Ted takes you through the steps to get started in a medium that will open your photography business to...


Anyone using Leica R lenses on Nikon

nick baker , Apr 21, 2009; 09:57 p.m.

Has anyone here used Leica R lenses adapted to their D3/D700? Are these lenses giving you the same quality of image as you saw on the film body? I might go ahead and modify mine if so, instead of keeping a film body just so I can use these lenses occasionally. It would be great to hear from anyone with experience doing this. I will post the same question in the Leica forum.

thanks

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Eric Pelve , Apr 21, 2009; 10:23 p.m.

Hello Nick:

I adapted a Leica R lens (180mm APO Elmarit f2.8) on my Nikon DSLRs (D300 and D700) using the Leixtax bayonet from David (owner of Leitax) and it works perfectly well. I took pictures of the conversion process to help David enrich his on-line collection of instruction guides and it is now posted on his web site:
http://leitax.com/conversion/leica/APO-Elmarit_180-2.8/index.html

It works like a charm and I must say that I sold my Nikon 180mm ED AF f/2.8 because I could not stand the comparison anymore. I have a series of pictures taken with the Leica Elmarit 180mm APO lens and Nikon D300 at the following link:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/37067061@N05/sets/72157616543206365/

I recommend highly this conversion as you combine the best of both worlds: best lenses and best digital bodies (for the time being the D700 remains for me an unbeatable value performance/price)


Leica Elmarit 180mm APO-R on Nikon D300

Dieter Schaefer , Apr 21, 2009; 10:48 p.m.

I have converted the Apo-Telyt 180/3.4 to F-mount using the mount supplied by leitax - the lens is now used on D200/D300. Optical quality is outstanding, of course, but manual focusing on a DX camera has its problems - with the stand screen one has to rely on the focus indicator - which precludes shooting anything that moves. -These problems may or may not occur with an FX camera - if you can reliably manual focus with your camera, things will be fine with the Leica lenses too. Make sure to study the list of lenses that cannot be adapted or that need "shaving" to clear the mirror movement of an FX camera.

Lex Jenkins , Apr 21, 2009; 10:58 p.m.

I don't recall whether it was Eric or Dieter but a couple of folks have uploaded to the weekly Wednesday Pic threads using Leica R lenses on Nikon bodies.

Dieter Schaefer , Apr 21, 2009; 11:14 p.m.

There is an "older" related thread in the Leica forum: http://photo.net/leica-rangefinders-forum/00RoUV - not specific for the D3/D700 but more generic for the conversion itself.

Hansen Tsang , Apr 22, 2009; 12:31 a.m.

The extreme purists may say no but in all practical purposes I love my Leica R lens on any body. I changed the mount to Nikon F and I can use them on the Nikon digital bodies or I can use them via a Nikon F to EOS adapter on the Canon bodies or I can use them with the Nikon F to Micro 4/3s on the Panasonic G1. I have also put on the Pentax mount and use them on the Pentax bodies.
I can't tell the difference in image sharpness between the digital and the film bodies personally but I don't quite qualify to make judgement because I simply don' shoot either film to compare. However I love the way the lens works on the Nikon except for my D90.

Georg S , Apr 22, 2009; 06:58 a.m.

I changed the mount of an Apo-Telyt-R 180mm/3,4 and of a Summicron-R 90mm/2,0 to Nikon.
To be honest I haven't used both lenses that much - while the Summicron 90 is really nice I have found it's harder to focus than the Nikkor 105/2.5. Same goes for the Apo-Telyt - for sports or other press-stuff AF is clearly an advantage.
I have plenty of other lenses in both focal-lenghts and see the strengths of the Apo-Telyt in static subjects like city-scapes or other pictures when I have the time to set-up a tripod and work without time-pressure. Without tripod and careful focusing (live-view is a great help) I feel I can't squeeze the legendary sharpness out of this lens.
The Summicron 90 is already my preferred lens for shooting smaller stills like sculptures.
PS: If you do the conversion use a quality screwdriver - I've used a really cheap one for the first conversion and damaged the tiny screws.
Please excuse my english, georg.


Nikon D700 with converted Summicron-R 90 at about 5.6

nick baker , Apr 22, 2009; 11:04 a.m.

Thanks for all the responses. I have a D300 and already use some Nikon manual focus lenses on it. I also know that the conversion process works. I am mostly interested in whether, if I switched to a D700, the Leica R lenses would continue to perform as well optically as they do on film. I find myself finding excuses to use my Leica R6 film camera because I so like the lenses, 35/2.8 Elmarit particularly, and wonder if it makes sense to consolidate the systems. From the replies, it seems that everyone is happy with their converted lenses, and there is not reason to think their performance suffers with a digital sensor. By the way, my photography is strictly a hobby, not for professional purposes.

Thanks again

Oskar Ojala , Apr 22, 2009; 11:38 a.m.

I haven't done it, but have done a lot of background research related to it. I think that for some lenses it would be worth it, but not necessarily all (esp. older lenses). In any case, the conversion is reversible, so if done carefully it only costs time and money if it doesn't work out as expected.

Howard Cummer , Apr 23, 2009; 07:04 a.m.

Nick,
I have used R lenses, 19mm, 28mm, 50mm, 90mm, 100mm Macro, 180 APO on a variety of Leica film cameras from R6 to R8 and then with adapters on a variety of Canon Digital Slrs up to and including the D1 and 5D.
I found accurate exposure and wide angle focusing to be a problem for me with the Canon 5D and finally sold that and moved over to the Nikon D700 where focusing seemed easier and there was no exposure drift as you shut down the lenses (these problems are well discussed in the archives of various forms), I have exchanged bayonets on all my R lenses except the 28 and the 100 (both ROM lenses) and those will be done shortly. I don't want to start a film versus digital war but at higher ISOs the D700 has much less noise than the equivalent film ISO
please see:
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Howard+Cummer/R+lenses+on+Nikon+D700/
for pictures,
Cheers
Howard


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses