A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Nikon Lenses and Optics > Cheapest Telephoto Lens for...

Featured Equipment Deals

Creatively Using Selective Focus in Photography and Photoshop Read More

Creatively Using Selective Focus in Photography and Photoshop

Harold Davis, photographer, author, and print master, shares with you how to use selective focus as a creative tool, including in-camera and in Photoshop.

Latest Learning Articles

Featured Member: Katarzyna Gritzmann Read More

Featured Member: Katarzyna Gritzmann

Photo.net featured member Katarzyna Gritzmann talks about photography and portfolio of images.

Cheapest Telephoto Lens for D5000

ANAND KRISHNAMOORTHY , Jun 30, 2009; 10:08 a.m.

Hi -- am very new to this site and to DSLRs. Can anyone tell me what may be a reasonable and obviously the CHEAPEST telephoto lens that's compatible with the new Nikon D5000? Thanks.


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Andy L , Jun 30, 2009; 10:13 a.m.

The cheapest? Look at the Sigma 70-300 but make sure it's the newer version with the built in motor. Their model naming is so bad the guys at Calumet couldn't tell me exactly what I was holding until I mounted it on a camera, tried the AF and listened for what it sounded like. It's also got some usefulness as a macro lens.

But also do look at the Nikon 55-200 AF-S VR. It's reasonably priced and quite good as "kit" type lenses go.

Kent Staubus , Jun 30, 2009; 10:14 a.m.

"Cheap" and "telephoto" aren't words that go together, and you gave NO clue what you will be photo'ing. I'll take a total shot in the dark and suggest the Nikon 70-300mm VR. If you're willing to focus manually, an older Tokina or Sigma 400mm f5.6 lens is probably the cheapest. Check E BAY. You'll need a tripod to get sharp photos from one, of course.
Kent in SD

William T. , Jun 30, 2009; 10:58 a.m.

The Nikon 55-200 VR is cheap and has decent image quality when stopped down. I think it goes for like $150 - $200, but obviously does not have as much reach as the 70-300 VR.

Andy L , Jun 30, 2009; 11:03 a.m.

There's an Arthur C. Clarke novel where an engineer says to an administrator, "Do you want it cheap, good or fast? I can give you any two." The same applies to lenses.

Peter Hamm , Jun 30, 2009; 11:42 a.m.

Save up for the 70-300 VR at least.

Cheap telephotos. Ugh. Sometimes you're better off cropping.

Kent Staubus , Jun 30, 2009; 11:45 a.m.

The OP wants a lens to photo birds with. The cheapest I know of is the Sigma 70-300mm, which is about $160. While something longer such as 400mm would be better, the Sigma is at least decent for the money.
Kent in SD

Shun Cheung , Jun 30, 2009; 11:52 a.m.

Nikon also makes a very inexpensive 70-300mm/f4-5.6 G that is about $150 (not to be confused with the ED version or the 70-300mm/f4.5-5.6 AF-S VR which is also a G lens). It has no built-in AF motor, though.

Keep in mind that the D5000 cannot AF with lenses without built-in AF motor inside the lenes. And any telephoto lens that is below $200 is likely be of poor quality.

Eric Arnold , Jun 30, 2009; 11:52 a.m.

sigma also makes a cheapie 55-200 HSM model which is surprisingly optically-decent, but has a super plasticy build.

Bart van der Borst , Jun 30, 2009; 12:01 p.m.

I'd go for the 55-200 AFS VR, because it's the only lens i regret selling.
It's good and cheap, the VR compensates a little for the 3rd element.

    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses