A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Third-party Lenses > Nikon 10-24 VS: Sigma 10-20

Featured Equipment Deals

Reintroducing the Monthly Project: Advancing Photography Read More

Reintroducing the Monthly Project: Advancing Photography

We've all missed the monthly project! We're bringing it back with Tom Persinger first up. He shares insight and background on using the edge of the frame. Please add your photo to the thread and...

Latest Equipment Articles

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs Read More

4 Outdoor & Adventure Photo Packs

Photo packs have come a long way in the past decade, especially those that are targeted toward outdoor and adventure photographers. Alaska-based adventure photographer Dan Bailey takes a closer look...

Latest Learning Articles

5 Tips for Combating Red-Eye Read More

5 Tips for Combating Red-Eye

Red-eye doesn't have to ruin your photos. Learn 5 simple tricks to avoid and eliminate this undesirable photographic effect.


Nikon 10-24 VS: Sigma 10-20

Joe Dempsey , Sep 17, 2009; 08:57 p.m.

I have been a Nikon man for a long time and generally prefer Nikon glass unless my budget forbids. Back before Nikon offered anything in the 10mm range, I bought a Sigma 10-20 and have been generally satisfied with the results. Now the Nippon brethren have thrust the Nikkor 10-24 on the market. Does anyone have any experience or information comparing these two lenses.
Thanks,
Joe

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Matt Laur , Sep 17, 2009; 08:59 p.m.

And while you're comparing, make some brain space for Sigma's new 10-20 with the constant f/3.5. I'm looking forward to sorting them all out when there's more to go on.

Zeeshan Ahmed , Sep 18, 2009; 12:14 a.m.

I am in the same boat Joe, Bought the Sigma about 2 years ago, not that there is anything wrong with it...I did not get a chance to play with Nikon 10-20, However Nikon quality should be much better...

Hamish Gray , Sep 18, 2009; 02:49 a.m.

I borrowed a couple of Sigmas before investing in the new Nikkor (I have also owned the Nikkor 12-24 and the Tokina 11-16).

My conclusion is that for my needs, the 10-24 Nikkor is the best. Going all the way to 24mm makes it slightly more versatile than the Sigma of course, but I also preferred the pics I took with the Nikkor. However if I already had the Sigma (like you do) I doubt I'd swap it for the Nikkor unless I really needed to go all the way to 24mm. And as Matt already pointed out, the new Sigma may be even better. I'd definitely wait for it before I bought the 10-24.

I posted a little test I did of the 10-24 a while back. If you do a search in PN I'm sure it'll pop up. The majority of my wednesday pics are taken with the 10-24 and here are a couple more examples. No doubt the Sigma will probably perform much the same, although I have noticed the Nikkor is quite resistant to flare.


example 1

Hamish Gray , Sep 18, 2009; 02:49 a.m.

2nd example


example 2

Hamish Gray , Sep 18, 2009; 04:28 a.m.

100% crop from example 1


100%

Dave Lee , Sep 18, 2009; 10:59 a.m.

I too bought the Nikon 10-24 after having owned the Tokina 12-24 and the Sigma 10-20. The Nikon is very sharp across the zoom range, and handles flare well as can be seen in the above example. It is capable of professional results too.

Ryan Hamilton , Sep 18, 2009; 02:31 p.m.

well I don't have any test shots but I'd go the other way. I Like Hamish shoot real estate to the amount of 500+ shots a day and found the nikon's barrel distortion a lot harder to correct in PS than the 10-20 all the way through. I also find that the sigma has little distortion at 12mm and over where the nikon showed through 16-17mm and most of my shots are 14mm and under. I guess it comes down to what you're using it for and what your work flow is.

Ryan

Chris Court , Sep 18, 2009; 06:18 p.m.

I've had the Sigma for a couple of years now, and what a fun little lens it is. Last weekend I took a demo Nikon 10-24 for a spin from my local store, expecting to see perhaps marginally improved sharpness/distortion/CA than the Sigma. What I actually found was a quite shocking softness in the corners at 10mm. From other's comments however, I gather that this is not typical, and thus suspect that the example I tested may have had some issues.

John Hinkey , Sep 18, 2009; 06:35 p.m.

See this posting and discussion with pictures. I too found the 10-24 Nikon's corners quite soft even stopped down, unlike some of the reviews and lens tests, so it could have been a bad sample.
http://photo.net/nikon-camera-forum/00TUnj
- John


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses