Welcome to Photo.net: A Community of Photographers

Community > Forums > Nikon > Pods (Tri/Mono/Etc.) & Supports > Tripod (not too expensive...

Tripod (not too expensive please) recommendation for D90 + max 70-300

Vikas Kohli , Mar 30, 2010; 09:35 a.m.

I did do search on this forum and did not find any recent discussions on this.

I have D90 and the longest/heaviest of my lenses is 70-300 VR and I don't expect to get anything bigger than that anytime soon.

I would like to get some inexpensive recommendations for a tripod for me. Many thanks in advance.

Responses


    1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5   |   6   |    ...     Next    Last

Wade Roth , Mar 30, 2010; 10:24 a.m.

You should first read http://www.bythom.com/support.htm before purchasing a tripod. After that, head to http://reallyrightstuff.com/tripods/index.html to read up on your options. RRS is a great resource for information (they also have great products). When I bought my tripod and ball head, I called their 800 number to talk to a rep about what would work for me. He ended up recommending a tripod model that they didn't have in stock and even suggested a couple of places that might have the model in stock. I really got the feeling that they had my best interest at heart.
Good luck.
--Wade

Hans Janssen , Mar 30, 2010; 10:44 a.m.

Feisol CT 3402 + Manfrotto 486RC2 carbonfiber and too expensive and only 1.7kg.

Vikas Kohli , Mar 30, 2010; 10:53 a.m.

Wade - thanks for the links... looks like I need to shell out >US$600 Anything inexpensive ?

Hans - thanks for the pointers... Feisol doesn't look to be easily available

Bob Sunley , Mar 30, 2010; 11:02 a.m.

Gerald hallenbeck , Mar 30, 2010; 11:39 a.m.

This is what I purchased http://www.adorama.com/FPTPF1228.html Works great with my D80 and 70-200.

Dave Lee , Mar 30, 2010; 11:39 a.m.

An old Tilt-All or it's identical Japanese copy, a Star-D, can be had for around $100 or less and work perfectly for you. You do *not* need to spend $600 for a good camera stand unless you want the latest carbon fiber technology, and anyone who says you do is incorrect.

Eric Arnold , Mar 30, 2010; 11:49 a.m.

kikas, there are other options other than a $600 feisol. for instance the manfrotto 190 series, which starts at under $100 for the legs. (http://www.amazon.com/Manfrotto-190XDB-Section-Aluminum-Tripod/dp/B000N81BXO)

holds 11 lbs, weighs 3.5 lbs. just add a ballhead and you're good to go. if you dont have long/heavy lenses, and/or dont need an ultralight tripod for hiking, a carbon fiber 'pod may be a luxury you dont need.

Jay Poel , Mar 30, 2010; 12:05 p.m.

I use a Manfrotto 055XPROB and 846RC2 ball head for my D90 and 70-300 VR. Price was an issue when choosing for me and I think this was a decent compromise - but definitely read the Thom Hogan article that Wade posted.

http://www.henrys.ca/9863-MANFROTTO-055XPROB-TRIPOD-HORIZONTAL.aspx
http://www.henrys.ca/10355-MANFROTTO-486RC2-COMPACT-BALL-HEAD.aspx

Dane Strom , Mar 30, 2010; 12:12 p.m.

Go for the $175 Flashpoint tripod, as mentioned above. You will have no regrets. I use it, along with a Manfrotto 322RC2, with my D90/70-300 combo, and it works perfectly well.

If you have $600, of course go for something else. But if you can afford to spend about $300 on a tripod and head, go for the Flashpoint and a Manfrotto head.


    1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5   |   6   |    ...     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses