You've just learned one of the cardinal rules. Never shoot IR at f22.
- f22 has too much diffraction on IR. Heck, f22 is slightly past the diffraction limit for visible light, and you get a lot sharper pictures at f16, for visible light. The typical IR filter makes diffraction a full stop worse, so if f16 is good for visible light, f11 is good for IR. (see note 1).
- For a lens that forms IR hot spots, the smaller the aperture, the brighter and sharper the hot spot. At f16, the spot will be 40% bigger, but only 70% as bright. At f11, it will be twice the size of the one in your picture, but half as bright.
Now, you lucked out. Your spot is so small and so perfectly placed, that it's an easy shop-out. It's hard to tell what doubling the size but halving the brightness would have done.
OK, I mentioned "one of the cardinal rules". That implies that there's more than one...
Another rule: get the best hood you can find. A lot of the "energy" that "powers" the IR hotspot comes from outside the image. The lens hood that Nikon recommends for a 50mm f1.8 is round, and too short, and it lets in a ton of non-image light to feed the hotspot. I think it's also infra-white or infra-purple, instead of absorbing infrared, it reflects it, into the lens as stray light.
I shoot serious IR with a Cokin modular hood. I believe 3 sections is right for the 50mm f1.8. The Cokin is also infra-purple, I lined mine with black flock paper from Edmund Optics.
note 1) The normal, visible light "diffraction limits" are calculated for a wavelength of green light, 560nm. When you have a "weak" IR filter (wratten 89b, Cokin 007, Hoya R72) your peak sensitivity is about 740nm on an unmodified camera, and that means the Airy disc is grows 1.32x larger (740nm/560nm), just about a full stop. So f22 IR looks like f32 visible light, in terms of loss of detail and resolution. Shoot at f11. If you're using an unmodified camera with a really strong IR filter (Wratten 87C, Hoya RM90, B+W 093) then you might try f8.
It looks like an "IR hotspot", although I have never seen one this small or sharply defined.
That's quite normal for cameras that have an IR reflecting "hot mirror" filter like the D700 (D3, D2X, D200, D90). They have double or triple the hot-spot intensity of IR-modified cameras, or older cameras that lack a hot mirror, like D100, D1X, D70, D2H. Nikon introduced the hot mirror in the middle of the second generation: D2X and D200 have it, D2H and D70 don't.