Patrick Dempsey
, Aug 29, 2008; 05:01 a.m.
I am in no way connected to Olympus or Panasonic or Leica... I just like throwing ideas out into the wind. These
sketches outline a few thoughts I had on some possibilities for some Micro Four Thirds cameras based on legacy
camera designs.
The "L":
Based on Leica M body style. The accessory viewfinder has an optical viewfinder in the center which auto-zooms
based on the focal length of the lens. The windows above and below the viewfinder and wide angle fixed video
lenses for a digital RF system. Based on focus distance information and lens focal-length information from the
lens, the video is cropped and projected into the optical view finder as two overlapping, color tinted RF
patches. These patches could also be projected into the Live View LCD to allow for RF focusing at arm's length.
The OVF/DRF system would probably be limited to 12-135mm (the range for Leica RF lenses), but would work with
any M-4/3 or 4/3's lens in that range, as well as Leica and OM lenses with the correct adapter (see below). The
dimensions in the drawing are 90mm x 65mm x 35mm, with the accessory VF adding 25mm to the length.
The "F":
Basically the same as the L body, the F is based on the Olympus Pen F body design. The main sensor and
viewfinder are oriented vertically. The accessory viewfinder has the same zooming optical viewfinder as the
L-finder, but uses a digitally projected TTL split-prism focusing aid like the ones seen in manual focus SLR's.
The F-finder and L-finder could be swapped between either camera body alternatively allowing for DRF focusing or
TTL split-prism focusing.
The split prism focusing could be attained by the use of a beam splitter within the camera body in front of the
shutter. This beam splitter could also be used for TTL Phase Detection AF just like a dSLR. The glass surface
of the beam splitter would also protect the sensor from dust and internal parts of the camera from water, making
an underwater M-4/3 camera a possibility. Like the DRV system, the TTL split-prism could be projected either
into the optical view finder or onto the Live View LCD to enhance manual focusing of both AF and legacy manual
focus lenses.
Adapters to the system could possibly include a Leica M - M-4/3 adapter which would allow for fully integrated RF
focusing with any Leica M or LTM lens using the L-finder. The dial around the outside of the adapter would be
manually set to the focal length of the lens providing focal-length data for the L-finder DRF system. The Leica
cam would translate focusing data into electrical signal to the camera body.
The OM-AF - M-4/3 adapter is basically a telescoping USM with an OM mount on the end. It would allow for any
compact OM lens to be used on the M-4/3 body in auto focus when the lens is set to infinity. When the lens is
set to closest-focus, the adapter becomes an AF macro adapter. The ring around the adapter provides focal-length
data to the camera body and accessory OVF system. With the lens set to infinity it would even be possible to
manually focus the adapter using the DRF finder. Olympus made about 20 lenses which are shorter than 50mm and
weight less than 300 grams that could probably be used with such an adapter.
A telescopic extension adapter from 4/3's - M-4/3 would allow any 4/3's lens to be used on the M-4/3 camera
bodies with the added bonus of built-in telescoping extension tube. This drawing shows 40mm of extension, which
is more than enough to take many lenses into the Macro focusing range. Of course, any other lens adapted to the
original 4/3's mount could also be used with this adapter for close-up work. With the addition of the digital
TTL split-prism finder built-in to these bodies, manual focusing legacy lenses for Macro shots would be very easy.
Anyway, I have fun doing these.... now to wait and see what is actually produced and see how far I am from the
marque!
Brian Southward
, Aug 29, 2008; 05:56 a.m.
Olympus has had a fair amount of success with its 4/3 concept, due in part I think to being able to transfer some of its expertise from the OM SLR system and lenses to a DSLR. However, the M-4/3 concept does not seem to gel with any of its past products and I wonder if it is being driven by Panasonic. They have close links with Leica and may be planning a Panaleica camera, in which case your first idea is more likely to be close to the mark.
I really think the Pen F is history.
Ronald Moravec , Aug 29, 2008; 07:59 a.m.
Glad you included an optical VF accessory. I detest those electronic things almost as much as sticking a camera out 24" from my face.
My problem is by the time time all this gets made to Leica standard, it will be very expensive and too big. As much as I like my film Leicas, I would rather have a D40 Nikon than what you show.
Patrick Dempsey
, Aug 29, 2008; 08:09 a.m.
I am not sure what you mean about this not gelling with past products... Olympus's entire success story has been based on affordable, easy to use, carry anywhere, compact cameras. Just look at the original Pen cameras, the XA, the mju/Stylus cameras and compare them to the professional level Pen F and OM cameras.... Olympus designs have always been a bridge between "professional" features and quality, and "amateur" size and ease-of-use. If anything this fits more firmly into their historical role in the camera market than the 4/3's dSLR's which are rather over-sized compared not only to their sensor size, but to even the OM cameras in my opinion. But you might be right that this might be more of a push by Panasonic, as it fits in closer to their fixed-lens Leica-branded P-N-S cameras. These concepts are just fun ideas about what's POSSIBLE... not likely directions that either company will take, I honestly could care less about predicting the future and guessing about actual products, I'll leave the rumor-bloggers to that. :)
Gerry Siegel (Honolulu) 
, Aug 29, 2008; 02:54 p.m.
Interesting Patrick. You are a pretty good draftsman.
In a small camera, I could probably learn to live with a shoe mounted small optical finder, but your version is interesting. I know about the limitations of same, but that might not deter me from getting a small 4/3 camera to complement the larger 4/3 cameras. I have made mental break from the past when I got into Olympus digital and am actually getting used to composing on an LCD screen if it is bright enough and big enough. The micro system would have to have a good all around high quality lens w autofocus and a stabilization system. Solid construction by at least one of the partners would be a must. Weather sealing is really great for lenses. I no longer sweat the mold and humidity fogging that I use to be concerned with.
All of your concepts are interesting. I am glad that 4/3 is pushing ahead with innovation. In bodies and with their glass. Never thought to see aspherics and ED design get to the mass market as it has.
Andy K. 
, Aug 29, 2008; 07:00 p.m.
Patrick, very nice but where does the film go?
Patrick Dempsey
, Aug 29, 2008; 08:54 p.m.
Andy, in the Pen camera, or XA, or mju in your other pocket. ;)
john robison , Aug 30, 2008; 11:14 p.m.
Thanks for your effort Patrick, the Pen F concept really appeals to me, I have two working Pen F's and still after all these years they are still my favorites as a walkabout SLR. I wonder about power though. It seems that a lot of the size of DSLRs is taken up with batteries. Hopefully Olympus has been reducing the power required for their 4:3 system and have a compact battery for the M4/3 camera. Your pick off simi-reflecting glass is interesting but as you show it would it cover the whole field? Looks like it would only show the center few millimeters of the image.
Patrick Dempsey
, Sep 01, 2008; 01:49 a.m.
Yup, a few millimeters is all that's needed to provide TTL split-prism focusing and TTL Phase Detection AF. You already have TTL focusing with the Live View screen and the option of split-prism focusing or Phase Detection AF adds the accuracy of a real SLR that so many people complain about with PNS cameras. Of course the Phase Detection would only work across a sliver of the image, but really does anyone really NEED 30-some AF zones? Three or even five Phase Detection AF zones spread across the long axis of the sensor should be enough for any practical use, and when incorporated with the Contrast Detection that will already be available, it seems more than generous to me.... although I'm not an AF shooter at all so what do I know?
Marc Ramirez , Apr 12, 2009; 10:35 p.m.
I know this is an older thread, but I really appreciate you taking the time to make these drafts. I really hope that Olympus does use a style very similar to these. If it "looks" anything like your drawings, I will definitely be getting one. I don't know why these companies haven't used the older slr designs. Their micro 4/3 concept design was okay, but it really does look like an aluminum can of spam. I think the grip material should wrap around the sides as you have it. I hope their designers or marketing people realize that THIS is what we want and I hope that the speculation of the Pen-micro 4/3 being released in June is correct.
dan Mar , Oct 03, 2009; 05:53 a.m.
They kinda sorta did Marc, But better and made it even closer to the Pen F design. I like Patrick's OVF design better tho.