A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Olympus and Four-Thirds > EP1 vs. EP2 vs. EPL1 vs. EPL2...

Featured Equipment Deals

Basic Photo Tips: Aperture, Shutter Speed, and ISO Read More

Basic Photo Tips: Aperture, Shutter Speed, and ISO

Just as it was 100 years ago and just as it is today, every camera—be it film or digital—is nothing more than a lightproof box with a lens at one end and light sensitive film or a digital...

Latest Equipment Articles

The Week in Photography News Read More

The Week in Photography News

March 28 - April 3, 2015: Hear the latest goings-on in the photography world, from product releases to event and campaign announcements and more.

Latest Learning Articles

Understanding RAW vs. JPEG File Types (Video Tutorial) Read More

Understanding RAW vs. JPEG File Types (Video Tutorial)

One of the advantages of your DSLR camera is its ability to shoot in multiple file types, such as JPEG and RAW. This video tutorial will demonstrate the differences and show you the benefits of...


EP1 vs. EP2 vs. EPL1 vs. EPL2 differences in AF speed

Leslie Cheung , Dec 30, 2011; 07:19 a.m.

Are there are specific differences between the AF modules on the older pens? Does the 2nd generation say (epl2) AF faster than 1st? Or differences between ep2 and epl1? If I use a recent lens, say, 14-42mm IIr on it or a panasonic lens...Would there be a difference among the four? Thanks, I appreciated.

Responses

Marc Rochkind , Dec 30, 2011; 09:09 a.m.

A definitive answer would be hard to come by, made more complicated by a firmware update for the oldest of these that improved AF speed.

Yury UKhov , Dec 30, 2011; 12:47 p.m.

- even more complicated ,due to format in chose

Bruce Rubenstein , Dec 30, 2011; 05:47 p.m.

The difference between the II and IIr is only cosmetic. It also depends on which firmware version the first series cameras have. I recently bought a used E-PL2 kit and updated the firmware for both the body and lens, and noticed no difference in AF speed. Some of the Panasonic lenses supposedly are faster on the 3 bodies.

Like any "system" there seems to be a lot of particular body/lens specifics. There seems to be a large number of knowledge folks on this forum: http://www.mu-43.com/

Leslie Cheung , Dec 31, 2011; 05:49 a.m.

From my gathering, they are all the same with the latest firmware (with the same lens)...Are there significant differences among the them. I wanted to get one since there are many deals to be had with the older pens and I like IBIS. I think I'm going to stay put and wait it out though $200-250 is pretty enticing...

John Reynolds , Jan 04, 2012; 11:08 p.m.

Henry's in Canada has the Olympus E-PL1 with the 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 ED and MSC 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R on sale for 399.99.
http://www.henrys.com/67402-OLYMPUS-E-PL1-W-14-42MM-GOLD-And-40-150R.aspx
Might help overcome your speed concerns!

dan Mar , Jan 05, 2012; 06:08 a.m.

I would consider the E-PL1s. The newer 's' version has a higher ISO setting, the better kit lens, which focuses faster and is sturdier. I am actually considering getting one. It is selling for less than 370 new on the fleaBay. But it may be available other places i just haven't found it.

Jack Flannery , Jan 20, 2012; 04:04 p.m.

I have an EP-2 and a friend just bought an EP-3. It is much, much snappier than mine. So much so that I will probably be upgrading soon.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses