A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Olympus and Four-Thirds > Panasonic G1 or Olympus E-P1

Panasonic G1 or Olympus E-P1

Robert Thommes , Jan 20, 2012; 07:42 p.m.

Concerning these two m4/3rds camera options ONLY, which of the two would YOU feel to be the better camera for an inexpensive introduction into the world of m4/3rds gear? Both would come with their respective 14-42mm "kit" lenses. Both are several generations old by now, yet both still seem to get good reviews.
I simply want your personal opinion as to which you would choose, and maybe a "why" or two.
Thanks

Responses


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Yury UKhov , Jan 20, 2012; 08:00 p.m.

-with the same mount , Panasonic more in price balance body to lens

Michael Howard , Jan 20, 2012; 08:10 p.m.

Get a G2...B&H has them for $299! Or, if Olympus, an EPL-2. They are cheap as well. If I was going for one of the two you mention, it would be E-P1, hands down. My opinion, of course...

Michael Howard , Jan 20, 2012; 08:22 p.m.

As far as the why? I've shot both cameras, liked the Olympus better, simple as that. The jpegs out of camera on the Olympus are excellent, best in class in my opinion. I did not care for the viewfinder on the G1, very grainy to my eye, and slow reacting, though the Oly doesn't have a viewfinder. Oly has the in camera stabilization as well.

David Bookbinder , Jan 20, 2012; 09:32 p.m.

I chose the G1 and would do so again. The articulating LCD and excellent EVF and better 14-45 kit lens were more important than prettier JPEGs, IBIS, and physical size. If I were a JPEG shooter coming up from P&S, however, I might have come to the opposite decision.

Robert Thommes , Jan 20, 2012; 09:46 p.m.

How about if one was a JPEG shooter coming down from a DSLR?

Leslie Cheung , Jan 20, 2012; 09:59 p.m.

I don't have either but I do have other oly and panny models. And I like oly's jpegs better. The other plus is the IBIS. The G1 probably has an AF speed advantage as the olys are kinda slow until their latest generation in my experience...

Rob Bernhard , Jan 20, 2012; 10:12 p.m.

So i guess this means you didn't actually buy the E-P1 on December 4th, Robert?

http://photo.net/olympus-camera-forum/00ZgZ2

Oh wait, that's because you said you owned an E-P1 back in August, right?

http://photo.net/canon-fd-camera-forum/00Z7IU

It's a shame your experience with the E-P1 and all the other cameras you have purchased, sold, re-purchased, sold again, etc. has not led you to be able to draw any conclusions about any gear at any time.

Robert Thommes , Jan 20, 2012; 11:15 p.m.

Experience with the E-P1 was very short lived. Decided then, that I wasn't ready for m4/3rds quite yet. But I'm again considering it, and have interesting offers for either another E-P1 or G1. Since both are "old news" now compared to many newer models since then, I was interested to note just which of THESE TWO cameras were still considered to be the better of the two, and why. I have had experience with only the one (E-P1) of these two, and that was almost too short of a time to count in anyway as any sort of expert.
I do know that the E-P1's LCD (the only way images can be pre-viewed on that camera)is a problem in bright light. That drawback I recall very well. Other than that, it did take good pictures. Can the G1 take as good a picture as the E-P1?
G1 can't take videos? Not sure just how important that is.

Anna Turel , Jan 21, 2012; 07:22 a.m.

I have had both an E- P1 and a G1, which I updated to a G3 and an E-P3, so I can compare first hand and here is what I have to say : the E-P1 is the only camera you should avoid for the following reasons :

1) they don't have the plug allowing you to mount an EVF;

2) their display screen is of mediocre quality; you won't be able to frame your pictures in good outdoors lights.

3) the first kit lens was of very mediocre quality;

4) there was a problem with the IBIS when you shot near handhold able speeds, around 1/60 and 1/100s;

5) the AF is slower than on later models and than on the Panasonic. It is OK to shoot landscapes and still scenes, but not to shoot at playing children;

I don't use that body anymore, I didn't even give it to someone else (that would be a way to disgust them from photography). Nowadays I'm just using the battery as a spare for the E-P3 which is a much better camera. If you want the Olympus interface you should consider an E-Pl1,

The G1 inspire of being Panasonic's first model is still a very good camera.

1) It has a lovely fully articulated LCD, which allows you to shoot from unusual angles of view;

2) it has a great viewfinder, allowing you to shoot in bright light much more easily;

3) it comes with a much more reactive AF;

4) it has a very highly regarded 14-45mm kit lens, very sharp and with great local contrast;

5) on the down side, it has the same sensor as the E-P1, but the out of camera jpegs aren't as good as those of the E-P1. That IMO is not a reason to get the E-P1 over the G1. If you want Olympus nice Jpegs colors, get the E-Pl1/2 which have the EVF plug : you will need that EVF ! Go for the E-Pl2 rather than the E-Pl1 if you can : it has a better kit lens.

6) other downside, you won't have IBIS, but OIS on selected lenses, included the kit lens.

Good luck with your purchase ! M4/3 are great cameras and except for the E-P1, you can't go wrong with any of them.


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses