Welcome to Photo.net: A Community of Photographers

Community > Forums > Pentax > Trying out my *istD

Trying out my *istD

Bill O'Neill , Mar 14, 2005; 01:15 p.m.

This camera is relatively new to me. I have only taken about 300 or so test images and this is the first time I've had it in the field doing serious work. Coming from using a Z1-p, it will take a little getting used to I think. But I've got a week here in the everglades to get the move right. I'll post some updates on the experience over the week. Today, the shooting was not that great overall. See my post in the Nature forum.

On the camera, it's small! It looks like a lens cap on the back of my 600/f4. It definitely has more release lag than the Z-1p and the frame rate is a good deal slower. All just things to get used to. However, getting the images back right away is a REAL bonus. This morning I shot about 200 images and will keep about 30. This is a much lower yield than I usually get with film. I'm guessing its due to the learning curve on the camera and using digital in general.

Is this a typical keep rate for those of you that shoot nature?


Louisiana Heron, Everglades, Pentax *istD @ iso 200, Pentax 600/f4, 1/1000 @ f5.6

Responses

Guy Yates , Mar 14, 2005; 07:07 p.m.

Bill,

Slightly off topic. Are you using the SMC FA* 600mm f/4 ED [IF]? I have *istD and before investing in this lens I would appreciate your candid comments on how the lens handles - both good points and bad. Do you have further photographs I could view which were taken using with this lens?

Many thanks in advance.

Bill O'Neill , Mar 14, 2005; 08:27 p.m.

Guy,

I did a review of this lens a few years back. I posted it in this (http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=000Snv) thread. The review was my second submission to the thread. Have a look at it.

I have taken thousands of shots with this lens. Being a 600, it is difficult to use, and being a Pentax, it is my only choice for my many pentax bodies. However, I think it is a great lens.

Here is another shot I took today.


Purple Gallinule, Everglades, Pentax *istD @ iso 200, Pentax 600'f4, 1/1000 @ 5.6

Guy Yates , Mar 15, 2005; 08:41 p.m.

Bill,

Many thanks for the link and subsequent informative write up. No idea why I never came across it whilst doing many searches for such information on this site.

Bill O'Neill , Mar 15, 2005; 09:59 p.m.

After day two in the field I have more impressions of this camera.

First, it has very good colour accuracy, but the images seem just a tad soft. Certainly softer than I would expect from good film.

It is noisy! It makes more noise than my Z1-p, which has to be one of the nosiest SLRs in history. Why do Pentax make such noisy cameras? Well, at least it gets the animals to look at me.

I had it lock-up on me today. I had to remove the battery grip and the batteries in the body to get it to reset. Even the power switch could not turn it off. Does anybody else experience that?

It does not work very well with the Pentax AF500FTZ. Not sure why not, but exposure was all over the place. I don?t get this with the AF500FTZ and the Z1-p or with the *istD and the AF360FGZ. There seems to be something funky going on here.

It does not seem to hold detail in the highlights as well as film does. I miss this. Overall, the exposure latitude seems to be a bit less than something like Ektachrome 100VS or Provia 100F.

It has a nasty habit of re-focussing spontaneously, even though the shutter release is held halfway down. This is an annoyance and has ruined some good shots.

I am sorry all this feedback is negative. It does have a bunch of good features, but they are all obvious and inherent in digital technology.


Great Blue Heron (juvenile - largest I ahve ever seen), Everglades, Pentax *istD @ iso 200, Pentax 300/f4.5 1/800 @ f5.6

Bill O'Neill , Mar 16, 2005; 03:39 p.m.

Well the little *istD performed better today. Or should I say, I seem to be getting the hang of it. It didn't lock up once, which was nice. Must have been something I did, but I'll reserve my verdict on this one for a while.

I'm still having a little trouble getting the exposure right for the latitude of the sensor. It's coming, but more slowly than I'd like.

I have found that this little camera along with my fairly light Tamron 300/f2.8 make a great flight combo. Now I just have to learn to get in front of my subjects. Actually I like this shot. The symmetry between the wings is almost perfect.


Snowy Egret, Everglades, Pentax *istD @ iso 200, Tamron 300/f2.8, 1/2500 @ f4

Rob Bernhard , Mar 16, 2005; 04:41 p.m.

Bill,

Thanks for the updates. I'm pretty curious about the *istD and *istDS cameras.

<< It has a nasty habit of re-focussing spontaneously, even though the shutter release is held halfway down. This is an annoyance and has ruined some good shots. >>

I'm curious, does it do this with any lens or just the 600?

Bill O'Neill , Mar 16, 2005; 05:08 p.m.

Hi Rob,

I guess I should have mentioned this in my latest update. I have figured out what was going wrong on the re-focusing issue. Again, it seems that the problem is more with me than the *istD. What has been happening is, I was assuming that once the little red square around the AF point went out, the camera had finished focussing and had locked. It turns out that the lock only occurs once the green hexagonal indicator has been illuminated. If I stick to this criterion, there are no problems with the camera re-focussing on me.

I should also mention that I am getting what I consider to be terrific battery life. I have been shooting straight for 3 days, over 700 exposures and have still not needed to charge the batteries. In fact, the battery indicator still shows full. I am using 2300 ma/hr batteries in both the grip and body. I have been using AF for all shots, but have not been using the internal flash. However, since I have been having trouble getting the exposure right (my fault, not the camera's) I have been using the monitor quite a bit. I have an extra set of batteries, so I should be able to find out how far I can go under these conditions. I?ll report on the outcome.

Bill O'Neill , Mar 17, 2005; 06:05 p.m.

I used the *istD alongside the Z1-p today. It was kind of nice to compare them directly. The Z1-p is definitely easier to manually focus with as the image is brighter and larger. One thing I really miss on the *istD is the Z1-p's ability to set the flash compensation in the camera body. That is one handy feature.

The *istD works well as a part of my usual macro set-up with the Pentax A* 200/f4 a Stroboframe bracket and the AF500FTZ. I can use the AF360FGZ with this set-up too, but I need to buy another adapter. I'll get flash compensation with that unit, but it is still more convenient in the body. It works with any flash then. Pentax should make this a standard feature to differentiate themselves from all the other junk out there.

Batteries are still going strong with over 1000 images shot.


Cardinal, Everglades, Pentax *istD @ iso 200, Pentax 600/f4, 1/850 @ f5.6

Back to top

Notify me of Responses