A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Pentax > Pentax K10 low light lens

Featured Equipment Deals

Capturing the Heart of Home Read More

Capturing the Heart of Home

With cool days ahead, join "everyday photographer" Tracey Clark as we glance around the home for indoor photo opportunities and inspiration. From daily routines to holiday celebrations, Tracey gives...

Latest Learning Articles

Featured Member: Katarzyna Gritzmann Read More

Featured Member: Katarzyna Gritzmann

Photo.net featured member Katarzyna Gritzmann talks about photography and portfolio of images.

Pentax K10 low light lens

vincent collins , Oct 05, 2010; 05:37 p.m.

Hi folks I'm a amateur photographer,most of my pictures are low light. Bands in low lit clubs and the action tends to be fast. I try not to use a flash, I don't want to ruin the show for everyone else. I was looking at the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC. Any suggestions. Thanks


    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Miserere Mei , Oct 05, 2010; 06:18 p.m.

Vincent, it doesn't really matter if the Sigma is a good choice or not, because it's the only choice for K-mount. Unless you want to spend a lot more on the outstanding Pentax 31mm f/1.8 Ltd. But for concert shooting (which I've done a bit of with the K10D), every photon counts and the f/1.4 of the Sigma will be very useful.

What lenses are you using now?

vincent collins , Oct 05, 2010; 06:33 p.m.

Like I said amateur all I have is a 10-17mm fisheye and a 18-55mm.
But 2 bands have used my pictures for fliers so I did something right.
Was also looking at the Sigma 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DC, since I don't have a zoom lens.
And its cheap.

Miserere Mei , Oct 05, 2010; 06:52 p.m.

I'm surprised you managed with the kit lens, which is very slow for small clubs.

The Sigma 30mm f/1.4 gets good reviews, and a number of people on this forum own one. If I didn't have the 31 Ltd I would have bought the Sigma for sure.

Another great lens is the Pentax FA 50mm f/1.4, although it's more for torso shots given the focal length. If you want something wide and fast, your only option is the Sigma 20mm f/1.8. You might find 30mm isn't wide enough in some situations.

Yury UKhov , Oct 05, 2010; 07:56 p.m.

to much zoom on FA 50 , go with DA*55

PJ Vesterback , Oct 05, 2010; 10:29 p.m.

"to much zoom on FA 50"
So go with a longer lens????

Javier Gutierrez , Oct 05, 2010; 10:36 p.m.

Does anyone know anything about the Sigma 24f/1.8?

Larry Lynch , Oct 05, 2010; 10:40 p.m.

I also recommend the 31mm f 1.8. I also own the 77mm f 1.8. In low light conditions I am often perplexed by the uncertain and sometimes unreliable focusing of the K10 and 77mm combo. Love it otherwise. Just sayin. You cant go wrong with the 31mm.

Jim McDermott , Oct 05, 2010; 10:47 p.m.

No point looking at the 31mm - its price is now beyond anyone with less money than common sense. Try hunting around for an old SMCA 28mm f2. Yes, manual focus, but 98% of the 31mm's performance for less than a quarter of the price (this from my own experience of the little beauty).

Jeremiah Corbin , Oct 05, 2010; 11:36 p.m.

Vincent, we might try to define "low light" first. :-) I've used my P 50/2 with mild frustrations in club settings, and concert photography ain't my thing. I still found myself shooting ISO1600 at f/2. Then again, my definition of low light was 3 100W bulbs with deflectors at a distance of 12-15 feet.... with colored gels. To say that the lighting was "abysmal" is an understatement.

I'd love the Sigma30. Really. Go buy it. :-) That extra stop would have let me shoot at ISO800... with AF.

    1   |   2   |   3     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses