A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Philosophy of Photography > Is this child pornography?

Featured Equipment Deals

Navigating Lightroom: The Web Mode (Video Tutorial) Read More

Navigating Lightroom: The Web Mode (Video Tutorial)

Lightroom's Web Mode allows you to create a gallery that can be directly uploaded to your website. Learn how to use this feature in this video tutorial.

Latest Equipment Articles

The Week in Photography News Read More

The Week in Photography News

March 28 - April 3, 2015: Hear the latest goings-on in the photography world, from product releases to event and campaign announcements and more.

Latest Learning Articles

Understanding RAW vs. JPEG File Types (Video Tutorial) Read More

Understanding RAW vs. JPEG File Types (Video Tutorial)

One of the advantages of your DSLR camera is its ability to shoot in multiple file types, such as JPEG and RAW. This video tutorial will demonstrate the differences and show you the benefits of...


Is this child pornography?

Clive F , Sep 17, 2007; 09:53 p.m.

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

. Kaa , Sep 17, 2007; 10:03 p.m.

Yeah, well, you know the advantages of digital photography over film? :-)

Kaa

Brian S. , Sep 17, 2007; 11:22 p.m.

... or Polaroid.

Uncle Goose , Sep 18, 2007; 07:11 a.m.

This is just rediculous, I have dozens of photographs being naked when I was 5 or 6 years old. Those parents only wanted to photograph some funny bath moments and are now accused for kiddieporn, what a sad world it has become.

Pete Millis , Sep 18, 2007; 07:53 a.m.

You may remember in 1996, Julia Somerville (a TV newsreader here in the UK) and her husband were arrested after Boots (a pharmacy that does film processing) called in the police because she had a film processed showing her 7yr old kid in the bath!

Michael Whitney , Sep 18, 2007; 01:17 p.m.

People have lost all common sense.

Nicholas Perzik , Sep 18, 2007; 04:14 p.m.

that's absolutely insane.

John Falkenstine , Sep 18, 2007; 11:05 p.m.

While its an interesting article, collecting various stories about self-appointed photolab moral police, I would prefer something a bit more factual. I remember another Salon.com Story about Republican dirty tricks during our last elections; trouble is, some of them just were not true. While I'm not Republican, I believe in factual reporting. Lumping together a bunch of stories doesn't always mean that everything is true. The basic problem is that many people all over the world haven't caught on to the fact yet that they weren't born fully clothed (Polyester for Baptists and Republicans, Cotton for Liberals). I think some other religions can't even risk thinking about birth.

Joel Berry , Sep 19, 2007; 07:02 a.m.

That story is almost eight years old. I wonder if anything like that has happened recently.

Rene GM , Sep 19, 2007; 07:49 a.m.

I thought porn defines as sexual arousing images. Being naked just is not enough.


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses