A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Philosophy of Photography > Is this child pornography?

Featured Equipment Deals

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM A Review Read More

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM A Review

Pro family photographer, Stacy Bostrom, reviews the Sigma 50mm f/1.4. See how this lens stacks up against her tried-and-true favorite.

Latest Equipment Articles

Choosing a Mobile Photo Printer Read More

Choosing a Mobile Photo Printer

In today's mobile, digital world, we carry hundreds or even thousands of pictures around on our smartphones and tablets. Tom Persinger looks at 4 different mobile photo printer options for getting...

Latest Learning Articles

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial) Read More

Advanced Printing with Lightroom (Video Tutorial)

Building upon last week's Basic Printing with Lightroom video tutorial, this advanced printing tutorial will teach you to print contact sheets, print multiple images at a time, use Lightroom's present...


Is this child pornography?

Clive F , Sep 17, 2007; 09:53 p.m.

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

. Kaa , Sep 17, 2007; 10:03 p.m.

Yeah, well, you know the advantages of digital photography over film? :-)

Kaa

Brian S. , Sep 17, 2007; 11:22 p.m.

... or Polaroid.

Uncle Goose , Sep 18, 2007; 07:11 a.m.

This is just rediculous, I have dozens of photographs being naked when I was 5 or 6 years old. Those parents only wanted to photograph some funny bath moments and are now accused for kiddieporn, what a sad world it has become.

Pete Millis , Sep 18, 2007; 07:53 a.m.

You may remember in 1996, Julia Somerville (a TV newsreader here in the UK) and her husband were arrested after Boots (a pharmacy that does film processing) called in the police because she had a film processed showing her 7yr old kid in the bath!

Michael Whitney , Sep 18, 2007; 01:17 p.m.

People have lost all common sense.

Nicholas Perzik , Sep 18, 2007; 04:14 p.m.

that's absolutely insane.

John Falkenstine , Sep 18, 2007; 11:05 p.m.

While its an interesting article, collecting various stories about self-appointed photolab moral police, I would prefer something a bit more factual. I remember another Salon.com Story about Republican dirty tricks during our last elections; trouble is, some of them just were not true. While I'm not Republican, I believe in factual reporting. Lumping together a bunch of stories doesn't always mean that everything is true. The basic problem is that many people all over the world haven't caught on to the fact yet that they weren't born fully clothed (Polyester for Baptists and Republicans, Cotton for Liberals). I think some other religions can't even risk thinking about birth.

Joel Berry , Sep 19, 2007; 07:02 a.m.

That story is almost eight years old. I wonder if anything like that has happened recently.

Rene GM , Sep 19, 2007; 07:49 a.m.

I thought porn defines as sexual arousing images. Being naked just is not enough.


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses