A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Philosophy of Photography > Is this child pornography?

Featured Equipment Deals

Basic Image Development in Lightroom: Color Editing (Video Tutorial) Read More

Basic Image Development in Lightroom: Color Editing (Video Tutorial)

Learn basic HSL (hue, saturation, and luminance) color adjustments as well as split toning (adjusting color in highlights and lowlights) in this next video.

Latest Equipment Articles

Triggertrap Mobile Review Read More

Triggertrap Mobile Review

Triggertrap is a great alternative to a camera remote that will turn your smartphone into a sophisticated shutter release. Read more about its many triggering modes!

Latest Learning Articles

Portrait Photography - Part II (Video Tutorial) Read More

Portrait Photography - Part II (Video Tutorial)

Learn the basics of Portrait Photography in Part II of this video tutorial, covering the essentials on timing, posing, and cropping.


Is this child pornography?

Clive F , Sep 17, 2007; 09:53 p.m.

Responses


    1   |   2     Next    Last

. Kaa , Sep 17, 2007; 10:03 p.m.

Yeah, well, you know the advantages of digital photography over film? :-)

Kaa

Brian S. , Sep 17, 2007; 11:22 p.m.

... or Polaroid.

Uncle Goose , Sep 18, 2007; 07:11 a.m.

This is just rediculous, I have dozens of photographs being naked when I was 5 or 6 years old. Those parents only wanted to photograph some funny bath moments and are now accused for kiddieporn, what a sad world it has become.

Pete Millis , Sep 18, 2007; 07:53 a.m.

You may remember in 1996, Julia Somerville (a TV newsreader here in the UK) and her husband were arrested after Boots (a pharmacy that does film processing) called in the police because she had a film processed showing her 7yr old kid in the bath!

Michael Whitney , Sep 18, 2007; 01:17 p.m.

People have lost all common sense.

Nicholas Perzik , Sep 18, 2007; 04:14 p.m.

that's absolutely insane.

John Falkenstine , Sep 18, 2007; 11:05 p.m.

While its an interesting article, collecting various stories about self-appointed photolab moral police, I would prefer something a bit more factual. I remember another Salon.com Story about Republican dirty tricks during our last elections; trouble is, some of them just were not true. While I'm not Republican, I believe in factual reporting. Lumping together a bunch of stories doesn't always mean that everything is true. The basic problem is that many people all over the world haven't caught on to the fact yet that they weren't born fully clothed (Polyester for Baptists and Republicans, Cotton for Liberals). I think some other religions can't even risk thinking about birth.

Joel Berry , Sep 19, 2007; 07:02 a.m.

That story is almost eight years old. I wonder if anything like that has happened recently.

Rene GM , Sep 19, 2007; 07:49 a.m.

I thought porn defines as sexual arousing images. Being naked just is not enough.


    1   |   2     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses