A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Photograph of the Week > talksII by Andris Polikevics

talksII by Andris Polikevics

photo.net Elves , Oct 25, 2011; 12:25 a.m.

This photograph was chosen because the Elves think it is interesting and worthy of discussion. When participating in the Photograph of the Week forum, please offer a critique of the photo -- address its strengths, its weaknesses.

talksII
Photograph by Andris Polikevics

Responses


    1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5   |   6   |    ...     Next    Last

Josh Root , Oct 25, 2011; 12:26 a.m.

Please note the following:

  • This image has been selected for discussion. It is not necessarily the "best" picture the Elves have seen this week, nor is it a contest.
  • Discussion of photo.net policy, including the choice of Photograph of the Week should not take place here, but in the Help & Questions Forum.
  • The About Photograph of the Week page tells you more about this feature of photo.net.
  • Before writing a contribution to this thread, please consider our reason for having this forum: to help people learn about photography. Visitors have browsed the gallery, found a few striking images and want to know things like why is it a good picture, why does it work? Or, indeed, why doesn't it work, or how could it be improved? Try to answer such questions with your contribution.

Bo Østergaard Jepsen , Oct 25, 2011; 04:49 a.m.

Very evocative photograph. Full of soul, as it were. Creative use of the water surface and good post processing. I very much like the colours and tones of the photograph. Good job by the model, as well.

Dexter Dee Dee , Oct 25, 2011; 06:22 a.m.

Very calm photo. She probably stood very still for a while, no water waves. Nice done, DDD

Jim Adams , Oct 25, 2011; 07:09 a.m.

Love the black and white, the d.o.f., and the square format. I can't help but wonder, though, if the reflection is real or a product of post-shoot processing. Although it does add another dimension to the photograph, it just looks a bit too clearly defined to be real.

Michael Linder , Oct 25, 2011; 07:12 a.m.

Andris:
Congratulations!
I suspect I've not seen a portrait photograph with the same degree of haunting beauty as this one. The subject's eyes and facial expression convey the feeling that she simply is part of the lake. It reminds me of the Lady of the Lake legend.
My best,
michael

Landrum Kelly , Oct 25, 2011; 07:46 a.m.

There is this nagging question in the back of my head: What if the film Deliverance (1969) had been about four women who decided to canoe the Chattooga, instead of the guys played by Burt Reynolds, Ned Beatty, Jon Voigt, and Ronny Cox?

In other words, I just cannot quite get past the idea that we are looking at her unseeing eyes frozen open after her bra strap got stuck on an underwater obstruction just past the last rapids. Maybe we better tie some rocks to her, guys, heave her overboard, and trust that she doesn't come bobbing belly-up downstream in the reservoir some months later.

I think that the sheriff is going to want an inquiry about this one. This woman is beautiful, but she appears to have been seriously abused, addled, or worse. Live women who will look like this for you will also sit down, roll over, and heel.

Apart from these considerations, I agree with everything Michael just said above: "The subject's eyes and facial expression convey the feeling that she simply is part of the lake." It reminds me of the last scenes of the movie filmed two counties west of my house in the late sixties.

Sorry, guys. This one is not in my fantasy book. There is an unfortunate nightmarish quality to it for me.

--Lannie

Alex Shishin , Oct 25, 2011; 08:12 a.m.

This is a well-made photograph. It is simple as that. Everything works very well together to create the single effect. I could have possibly done without the eye shadow, but what the heck. No need to quibble. It works well enough.

I had a peek at the artist's portfolio. There are several versions that for various reasons do not work, seemed forced. Then there is this image--as right as right can be.

This is a beautiful image. What else is there to say? Nothing.

Landrum Kelly , Oct 25, 2011; 08:15 a.m.

Oops! Make that 1972 rather than 1969. The latter year was when I got my first invitation to run the Chattooga with my undergraduate research director in the chem lab. Unfortunately, I declined, and then suddenly the river got famous--and crowded. (Still is.)

http://www.imdb.com/media/rm827562240/tt0068473

I do like the picture on one level, Andris. I truly do. I also wondered how on earth you got her to be still so long without making any waves. That is when my imagination started coming up with alternative ways to get the model to be still. I guess that sometimes we bring our own nightmares to the viewing of the photo--not that I have drowned anybody lately.

What else is there to say?

Lots more, Alex. Lots more.

I swear I can I hear banjo music. . . .

--Lannie

Fred G. , Oct 25, 2011; 08:30 a.m.

The processing here renders a nice, clear, tonally-tuned black and white image. Her eyes feel overworked and the d.o.f. is effectively used for atmosphere. The photo seems to me to center around a photographic gimmick, which seems obvious. It sort of shouts, look what I can do, by the photographer. The gimmick, rather than helping make a point and helping me see something more deeply, keeps me at bay and calls attention to its gimmickry rather than supporting something more penetrating.


    1   |   2   |   3   |   4   |   5   |   6   |    ...     Next    Last

Back to top

Notify me of Responses