Fantastic. Sorceress. It fills of dynamism. Very elegant.

Marvellous!!

One pierrot, five times. Wonderful job. 7/7

Striking photograph, perfectly done! 7/7 Encore!

splendid and expressive shot with a beautiful achitecture as a background

What can I say more? 7/7

Deja-fait

your mimes looks clumsily pasted in (5 times).

vuk.

No, I don't agree that they look clumsily pasted in, that is a mean and negative remark, but the last figure does look a little large. Anyway, very good idea, well done.

Clowns' expressions, ambiance and colors are perfect

beautiful birds ( ohhhhhhh sorry) pierrots. a great TVEZON image

....One great photographer. The expressions, composition, originallity and contrast are fantastic....Splendid work Vezon....Warm regards, Harry

This is a masterpiece. 7/7

7/7

Great photoshop work!

I have to agree with one of the previous posts: this is really artificial looking, though somewhat amusing.

Of course this LOOKS pasted in, it screams photoshop and if it is SO obvious the word 'clumsily' is quite in order.

Stating the obvious is sure negative in this case, but if saying the truth is 'mean' is obviously a matter for debate here on photo.net.

Has this been posted here before?????????

fantastic and very original picture!!!!!

yes, it's a composite, but we only understand that by looking deep into details.

I think the minor "mistakes" (for example, shaddows dropping to both sides), could be obvioused for the very original idea and, after all, very effective aesthetic result.

I wouldn't use the word "clumsily" in a negative sense, cause probably the "clumsy" way of merging the different images was made on purpose to try to give the sense of "not methodically arranged"...

Louis: yes, it has.

It's original, and it's not bad at all, but it still feels pasted. I wish it would be more believable. For example, a detail that spoils the montage imo is the fact that the front person was flipped. Just look at the shadows of the 2 front roses: they go in opposed directions, which makes the lighting impossible. Should we care ? Imo, yes. Regards.

Excelent image Congrats

very great image... compliments!

what can I say more - Fantastic! J` adore les Pierrots! Biliana

Incredible composition !!! My congrats.

Excellent.

Super Image!

If a tree falls in a forest and lands on a mime -does anyone care?

Lavely picture

always in my favourites at the photo net!

And another favorite of mine!

I like it, but it's obviously a pasted composite. I think if the shadows were corrected in the front it would help a great deal. Very original & like-able

The idea is a 7 for originality. So, I have a question (since we're supposed to be learning here). IF the lighting in front were from the camera flash, exactly in the middle of the two front figures, wouldn't it be possible (given that both figures are slightly tilted inward) that each shadow could be cast in a different direction if the flash came from near perfect middle????? The figures don't look flipped to me because the index fingers of the two up from are not the same, if you look closely. Whatever...it is such a shame to get hung up on such trivia when the imagery is so truly delightful. Vezon, you have the eye of a true artist.

Psychotik but really nice ;)

i love the concept, it's amazing. however seeing the flaw, i cant help but comment. it's quite true that it looks pasted and quite ackward if you focus first on the pierrots then lead your eyes to the depth of the perespective. the angle of the pierrots doesnt jibe with the perspective. the background should be slightly moved a little to the left. and the pierrots angle should follow the perspevctive line.

but over all this is a magneficent photo. a little adjustment and voila!

Like it, beautiful but disturbing.

*Love the wrinkles, traces of a life...botox per lo stupido!