Photographer's Request for Critique
--Lou Ann Aepelbacher
Buffalo, NY City Hall
I am attempting to convert from shooting jpg to shooting raw. This
image is my second attempt to work with one of my raw files (the first
is also in this same folder). Any thoughts, comments or ratings you
have for me would be greatly appreciated! :-)
Critiques
Lou Ann Aepelbacher
, December 01, 2007; 07:55 P.M.
ChrisH. in Southern California is trying to convince me to get into shooting RAW. I'm still not convinced, but promised him that I would shoot in RAW a little bit and play with it. This is the second result that I'm posting here on PN.
It snowed a little bit this morning here in Western New York, then the sky cleared for a few hours, and then the clouds rolled in off of Lake Erie and we're supposed to get some real snow again tonight.
I did most of the adjustments in the ACR software, then went into PScs3 and worked with the tweaking things ... levels and colors and cloning out power lines, etc. Any thoughts you have would be most helpful! Thanks!!
Walter Tatulinski
, December 01, 2007; 08:52 P.M.
One of your best, Lou Ann! Regards.
Scott Reeves , December 01, 2007; 09:57 P.M.
The color is nice Lou Ann. There are some perspective and straightening issues that could be addressed. But mainly I just want to back up Chris - I cannot imaging shooting jpeg instead of RAW except in certain situations where repetitive speed is critical. Six months from now you probably rue the day you were still shooting jpeg.
Mike Stemberg 
, December 01, 2007; 11:23 P.M.
Good going Lou Ann for making the switch to RAW ~ on certain easy-to-shoot shots you may find it hard to see the benefits but it is 100% worth it. For example I wonder if your new method, allowed you to recover or maintain that lovely 'unblown' cloud detail. I see perspective considerations here on this shot too, but then again I have on occassion deliberately left things untouched on that aspect to emphasise or dramatize tall buildings such as this one.
Regards ~ Mike
Mehmet Akin 
, December 02, 2007; 02:08 A.M.
hello
very good angle and light...congrats
Lou Ann Aepelbacher
, December 02, 2007; 08:54 A.M.
Thanks for the comments and the RAW encouragement, all. I want to mention that I like the wacky perspective that I get with my 10mm. If I were to adjust that, I would (1) have the same photo of City Hall that everyone else has (boring!) and, (2) would not have the nifty sky that I love getting when I shoot with the 10mm. Yes, I'll keep playing with the RAW shooting. I'm still not decided. I guess it's because I don't understand white balance well enough. The websites & tutorials all say "play with the temperature slider until it looks good". That's not quite good enough for me ... I don't trust my own eye with color casts, and I found that there was an 800+ degree temperature range that I found to be acceptable when I was "playing with the slider". I simply don't yet know what "looks good"......
Kim Slonaker
, December 02, 2007; 09:25 A.M.
Great sky, although I find the clouds on the left just slightly blown out. Another interesting perspective with this shot. I especially like that flag! :)
Richard Kynast
, December 02, 2007; 11:54 A.M.
Hi Lou Ann - nice shot. The converging angles add interest. I'm not so sure I agree with Kim about blown-out clouds. After you have used RAW for a while, you will love the control it gives you over a lot more than color (I have an extremely bad time with the color of Utah red rock). Anyway, have fun and thanks for sharing this with us.
Chris H (SoCalif) 
, December 02, 2007; 03:52 P.M.
Lou Ann-
Nice work on this; and I like the building centered with the lion in LL. I also don't think the clouds on the left are blown; there's still detail in 'em. The wide-angle really gives this some pop. Once you go raw you can't go back! LOL! Have a great day! Cheers! Chris
Susan Stone , December 02, 2007; 06:41 P.M.
Me too! I love the unusual perspective your wide angle gives to this beautiful towering building and the lion for foreground interest is perfect. The clouds look good to me but the sky has that "polarized" look that I don't like, but who am I too talk when I often over saturate my skies trying to get detail. And yes keep experimenting with RAW conversion, I shoot both JPEG's and RAW, depending on the camera I'm using. In my RAW converter there's a list of choices for white balance....such as; as shot, with flash, cloudy etc., and I have better luck using them for my white balance. In my Canon, when shooting in RAW, I leave the WB set to auto and then change it during editing. If I'm really serious about the shot I'm after I always use my tripod, between RAW capture and the use of a tripod I can see a noticeable difference in the quality of my images. And sometimes I'm just plain lazy and I "point and shoot".
Lou Ann Aepelbacher
, December 02, 2007; 07:00 P.M.
Thanks, everyone!! Susan - didn't use a polarizing filter here. I might have tweaked the sky color a little (really, only a little) in PS. But this is a very good idea of what the sky looked like yesterday. (Today ... snow, snow, snow!)
Susan Stone , December 02, 2007; 09:49 P.M.
I have a hard time editing skies, and if I'm using the little P&S camera I get a lot of artifacts and noise in my blues, but I know what you mean about it being pushed "just a little", some of my sky colors are so stange, but real, that folks think I've tinkered with them too much. Snow and cold here too.
Barry F - Oklahoma , December 03, 2007; 03:10 P.M.
Hi, Lou Ann,
From what I see on the news, if you go and take this same shot today, things might look a little different. You could do "Buffalo City Hall in White," perhaps. It's been cold here, and a bit of snow to the West of us, but no snow here yet. Maybe for Christmas.
Cheers
Joan Newhall
, December 07, 2007; 08:51 P.M.
I like the wide angle of the building. Capturing blue skies in Buffalo is great. Pretty clouds. Very nice.
Landrum Kelly 
, December 08, 2007; 08:25 A.M.
This is incredibly good, Lou Ann. The wide angle combined with the sky and the lion make this into something way out of the ordinary. On "Larger" it is really something special.
I actually remember this building from traveling from Akron to Niagara Falls way back in 1954, at the age of nine. Your picture is much better than the ones on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_City_Hall
--Lannie
Paweł & Grażyna Hachaj 
, December 09, 2007; 06:54 A.M.
Very interesting composition! Like it very much!
Henri Manguy
, December 16, 2007; 10:17 A.M.
Excellent shot, and KOLOSSAL architecture.
Pnina Evental 
, December 17, 2007; 11:06 A.M.
Lou Ann, very majestic City hall, the wide angle is well used here, and the blue backdrop of sky adds to the feeling.
David Roossien , December 17, 2007; 11:39 A.M.
Sally Delacruz 
, December 19, 2007; 07:28 P.M.
I was told "Raw" compositions are good and yours
proves it.
When I looked at this Pyramids cross my mind.
Thanks for sharing.
Keep warm in there, your part of town gets
frozen.
Merry Christmas!
Sally
Philip Turner - San Francisco, CA
, March 25, 2008; 03:20 A.M.
Lou Ann-
This is excellent and may have been an excellent candidate for the HDR (High Dynamic Range) feature of Photoshop CS2+. Something Wilson Tsoi makes great use out of by making multiple exposures of the same scene differently in RAW format. One for just the shadows, another for mid tones, and a third for the highlight detail. Then layering them all together and painting out your mask (black - white) for each layer to allow what you want from the different exposures to come through. Or use the HDR feature and let Photoshop do the work! I am also curious as to why there is a Canadian flag at half mast in from of a city office building in Buffalo, New York? Was it that they just chose their new Prime Minister in Canada? That would have been reason enough for me to put my flag at half mast too!
Lou Ann Aepelbacher
, March 25, 2008; 06:38 A.M.
Thanks, Phil! You know, I took this shot when I had just started shooting RAW, so I could definitely give it a try! Hmmm....
And as far as the half mast, I'm not sure. There's lots of Canadian stuff around here though ... the flag is flown around much of the area, and they sing both national anthems at professional sporting events (they don't do that all over the U.S., do they?) I guess it's probably a symbol of respect ... as the Canadian border isn't but a mile or two away (or at least "international waters").
Contribute a critique
Send a free photo eCard
Photo eCards from photo.net are a way to email someone a photo.net Gallery photo
with your personal greeting or message. Send an eCard to your contacts to announce
your portfolio on photo.net. Send one of your own photos as an eCard to ask
another photo.net member to write a critique of it. Share photos
and portfolios that you have discovered on photo.net with your friends. Or
just send someone a greeting or message for
a birthday, holiday, or other occasion or observance.
The recipients will receive an email from
photo.net announcing that they have received the eCard, with a link back to
photo.net. When the recipients follow the link, the photo and your message will
be presented to them in a special eCard format.
The easiest way to see how eCards work and what they look like
is just to send yourself one!
photo.net eCards are free: by sending one, you are letting others know
about photo.net and the exceptional photographers on the site! We won't charge you
for that. The email addresses you enter into this form will be kept private. Send as many
eCards as you like, but please don't turn this feature into a spam-a-thon.