Denis Rasulev , May 03, 2009; 11:36 A.M.
Picture of a life
Wow, this one is astonishing !! Very rare possible and perfectly taken :)
Nice from a composition point of view, gives a lot of thoughts about nature and progress. Amazing !
Spencer Jimmie Lee , May 03, 2009; 01:07 P.M.
Peter, Very good alignment and creative too.
Hansen Tsang 
, May 03, 2009; 03:03 P.M.
Perfect timing! This is one image to treasure.
Michael Marinier 
, May 03, 2009; 07:03 P.M.
In The Sky
What a great picture. Super shot. Wish I could get that lucky. Very nicely done.
Michael Marinier
Iftikhar Ahmad 
, May 03, 2009; 11:32 P.M.
Lovely coincidence and you were able to visualize and quick to act. All the technicals are good. A memorable picture.
Wendy de Kok , May 04, 2009; 03:30 A.M.
Haha lol very well seen :)
Don Lally , May 04, 2009; 06:54 A.M.
Wow great comp. and timing!!!
Uzay Kişi , May 04, 2009; 09:11 A.M.
Anuar Patjane 
, May 04, 2009; 04:52 P.M.
:)
David McCracken 
, May 05, 2009; 02:46 A.M.
Comments!
It seems a lot of the people commenting on this photograph seem to think this is a single unaltered shot. Don't get me wrong. It's good.
Sonia Mason , May 05, 2009; 06:53 P.M.
Brilliant. Very appealing and very well done!
Dushan B. Hadnadjev , May 06, 2009; 05:29 A.M.
Very nice and good eye!
Cheers, Dushan
Patrick Hennessey , May 06, 2009; 06:14 A.M.
Please prove this is undoctored.
You've got a slew of people assuming this is doctored. Please make it clear which photos of yours are doctored and which ones are not.
I didn't see any evidence to suggest this is fake. Many people believe that because it is so "incredible" that it "can't be real." Well, that isn't evidence and wouldn't stand in any court. Sadly, people believe what they want to be true, not what is true.
So, Peter, please put this issue to rest and tell us: is this a composite?
Axel Cordes 
, May 06, 2009; 07:48 A.M.
If it is manipulated, then is done good, as the light comes from the same direction having a look to the birds head and the planes head. In addition we do have only ONE EXIF, so I assume it's really like that - Peter did an incredible job.
But Peter: What I want to know more is:
How do you achieve to have the EXIF in the TechnicalDetails - I would like to offer that often, specially to the beginners, as they could be able to understand the image better & learn.
Thanx Axel
Technical Details EXIF Information extracted from file:
DateTimeOriginal: 2009:04:24 16:50:12
Camera Make: Canon
Camera Model: Canon EOS-1D Mark III
Exposure Time: 1/1000.0 seconds
FNumber: 7.1
ISO Speed Ratings: ISO 320
Exposure Program: Shutter priority
ExposureBiasValue: 0
Flash: Flash did not fire
FocalLength: 600.0 mm
Software: Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Axel Cordes , May 06, 2009; 07:55 A.M.
:-) if I compare
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9103340&size=lg
and
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9103339&size=lg
the answer seams clear - Doctor Peter - ;-) You put a smile on my face - at least for me a nice thing!
Ciao Axel
Peter Dam 
, May 06, 2009; 09:00 A.M.
Dear All
First of all, thanks for comments. I am sorry if any one thought this picture was taken from the right spot at the right time. It could have been the case but unfortuneately not. Its just a "easy" task done in PS by using two layers.
When I loaded the image for critique it was off course putt under the category of "Digital Alteration".
I can't understand why one can't see the category chosen when you display photo?
Best regards Peter
