All photos are copyright the photographer, and may not be used without written permission.
Comments on this portfolio:
Anupam Basu , August 08, 2005; 06:51 P.M.
Good work.
You have some very good shots here indeed. It strikes me that a medium format or even an LF rig would suit your style very well.
Kaushik Chatterjee
, September 13, 2005; 09:24 A.M.
Hi Budhaditya,
Golden start, beautiful execution of some really nice shots. Color balance is superb. Nice portfolio.......wait for more from you. Thanks and best wishes.
Arnab Kundu , February 21, 2006; 05:43 P.M.
keep clicking
You got a wonderful sense of compositions and colors. Have you tried slides? If you love color, you'll love it.
great portfolio...keep clicking :-)
A.K. Sircar 
, August 03, 2006; 02:05 A.M.
Budhaditya, you have few images in your portfolio but all are very good. I like your composition and tecnical perfection. Best wishes.
Craig Persel , February 14, 2007; 04:53 P.M.
Gorgeous work. Very technically proficient.
Amy Pang , October 07, 2007; 03:16 P.M.
Dear Deb
high quality technical work with good sense. Keep up. I like yr porfolio.
Pim de Ruijter
, October 11, 2007; 04:36 A.M.
Hello!
You have some excellent work in your portfolio. Beautiful shots, colorful and technically very good. Go on with this :)!
Regards, Pim
Joe Panchasarp , October 12, 2007; 05:21 P.M.
Thanks for the welcome
HI Budhaditya,
Thanks for your warm welcome and your kind comment on my photos. Very beautiful collection of 'art pieces' you have. Great work.
Marvin Dangerfield , October 13, 2007; 06:40 A.M.
Great work!
Budhaditya, love the color and composition of your work. Thank you for commenting on mine as well.
Chris Spracklen 
, October 20, 2007; 08:00 A.M.
Great start!
You've made an excellent start to your Photo.net portfolio, with a fine collection of well-taken shots. Keep up the good work! Kind regards, Chris
Nima Koochek Shooshtari , October 25, 2007; 07:42 A.M.
Hi & Thanks
your portofilo is so nice , creative and have strong images, very lovely images you have. and thank you very much for your kind comment and suggest on my photo, but you suggest that I should use smaller apertures for these kind of portraits for DOF and for better focus ,but as you know better than I , if I use smaller apertures then I have to use smaller shutter speed , then how should I avoid the subjects movements or how should I tell the subject not to move for for example 2 sec, if you inform me how, I will appreciate that. Thank you very much. Nima
Nima Koochek Shooshtari , October 27, 2007; 08:22 P.M.
Hi
Thank you very much for your early and kind reply to my question, I will do as you suggest, but: you told that many of my photos have not exact focus, would you please inform me how can I get more focus from my camera?(I often use small apartures and also use auto focus).thank you very much , good luck. Nima
Dejan Rasic , October 31, 2007; 09:43 A.M.
:-))
Beatuful landscapes. Like the work. Thanks for sharing with us. Regards
Dennis Aubrey , November 08, 2007; 10:47 P.M.
Fine portfolio ...
... your work is technically very good and has an atmosphere of its own. That, to me, spells style. Congratulations.
maria maria , November 09, 2007; 08:14 P.M.
I don't know if it's the Apian way...
I don't remember the street name, but it's the one you cross getting out from the Roman Forum on way to the Coliseum:).......
thank you very much for your indications; as a very beginner photographer, I appreciate any advice that helps me going better. I know that photo could have been improved, but I'm not (yet) an expert in image editing. All I can tell you is that I shooted it in a hurry, taking advantage on the few seconds when nobody crossed the street in front of me. As for the feet, I'll do my best trying to correct it; then I'll post the result to see your opinion again :)
thanks & all best!
maria maria , November 11, 2007; 07:55 A.M.
does it look better now?
hi, here I am again, with a slightly modified version of a photo you gave me some advice about.
I attached it here at my comment, but it may be easier for you to see it directly in my portfolio. thanks for looking :)
and congrats for your well-built portfolio!
best, maria maria
E. de Juan , December 06, 2007; 03:47 P.M.
Excelente trabajo con el color y la luz, creando unos ambientes muy atractivo. Magnificas fotos. Felicidades.
Saludos.
Vasilis Fotopoulos , December 30, 2007; 03:58 P.M.
PEACE & Happy New Year to you and your family.Basilis
Ana Maria Corbalan Flores , January 01, 2008; 01:30 P.M.
Feliz y prospero a�o 2008. Bsos Ana.
Raquel Sabina 
, January 03, 2008; 04:47 P.M.
Budhaditya
Thank you so much for your comment on my work. I appreciate it truly. You have a wonderful portfolio ...full of life and vibrant color. Please keep sharing with us.
Regards
Raquel
Chan Chen , January 08, 2008; 05:30 A.M.
Thanks
Hi, Budhaditya
Thanks for your kindly rating on my photo "tenderly under the bridge". I look through your portfolio. I like your photos especially the landscape ones. They are very beautiful and colorful. Best regards!
deb cloud
, January 24, 2008; 09:12 P.M.
Thanks so much...
Budhaditya
Thanks so much for taking the time to comment on my image "Profile Of A Goose..."
After looking through your portfolio, your comment means a great deal to me.
You have some amazing images. I aspire to someday capture the richness and sharpness you have captured in your work. I was a pleasure to view your images.
deb
roger sonneland 
, January 25, 2008; 04:06 P.M.
Budhaditya, am not sure how I have even ended up here in your portfolio. It is a pleasant surprise. Some lovely work on different subjects, it might be my first visit but it shall not be my last. All the best.......roger
Amy Rich , January 29, 2008; 11:43 P.M.
Thank you for taking them time to comment on my photo. Your work is just incredible. I love the vibrancy of your colors and your compositions. Just simply beautiful!
amy
John Soulnier S. III , January 31, 2008; 06:59 P.M.
josoIII
Thank you for the comment on my photo The big leaf spring, yes I did place that leaf there, it had one on it but not as nice looking. You are a man who has the same thoughts as I about the cgi work. I do some sharpening, color boost, crop thats about it. I have switch to a digital camera it makes photography more affordable and takes out some of the guess work. I really think of it as a image processor more than a camera. The details are so sharp I see some members adding film grain to there photos.Regards
Budhaditya Deb , February 01, 2008; 11:48 A.M.
Thanks John for your comment. However I dont understand what you meant. What is cgi, and where did I comment on it? And why do you think of only the digital SLR as just an image processor? Digital Sensors are no different than film emulsions in that both somehow manage to capture all the shades of colour. Both have a very complex technology underneath, developed over a long period of time. The camera which is essentially a light box, pales in comparison to the technological miracle of either analogue film or digital sensors.
John Soulnier S. III , February 01, 2008; 06:54 P.M.
josoIII
CGI is short for computer generated image. I think a film camera and a ccd sensor have vast differences, light traveling in waves is interpolated a little different in both. Film is stopping the light waves and digital is reading light wave frequency, and then using a RGB some cameras have a Y sensor also, and that make colors more vivid, And then with some math, the image is processed and stored on a chip. I hope this helps if you every decide to use one of these light imaging processors. They can be converted for IR work also.
Budhaditya Deb , February 02, 2008; 12:38 P.M.
In film you have the RGB layers (sensitive to each colour) which create the shades. You have different types of film which can give vivid, bright, neutral colours depending on the emulsion layers. In digital you have RGB sensors (sensitive to difference colours). Some sensors might have in YUV instead of RGB (which is essentially the same thing, different convention). I know a few things about signal and image processing as part of my job. But I was talking more from a philosophical difference between the two rather than getting too technical. Camera is still essentially a light box. Image processing, whether wet or digital comes later. However its a lot easier to do all that in digital.
John Soulnier S. III , February 02, 2008; 02:34 P.M.
josoIII
Hi how are you I like our little debate, My thoughts are light travels 186,000 miles a second you are not photographing light, it is a reflection of waves given off by the object. As I'm sure you know black tries to absorb all the light an white reflects it. So your term Light box should be upgraded to a Reflection box. Reflection is really what is photographed.
Mahen Konwar , August 01, 2008; 08:01 A.M.
great work
Hi Deb
you have a very vibrant and colourful portfolio....I love them all......by looking at your slides I am inspired to work with my slide films. How beautiful the tones and intensity of the colours of your captures. Great....
Regards
Mahen
Nima Koochek Shooshtari , December 27, 2008; 06:25 A.M.
Hi
Mary Christmas and happy new year 2009 to you and yours Budhaditya . with best wishes. Nima
A.K. Sircar 
, May 03, 2009; 11:57 A.M.
Budhaditya, I am visiting your site after nearly three years. Your portfolio his richer with excellent images. Best wishes.
Carlos Rodriguez , July 22, 2009; 01:03 A.M.
Hi
Great Velvia portfolio. Full of color and detail, congratus!
Shantanu Sane
, August 13, 2009; 09:07 A.M.
Cheers!!
Wonderful images Budha, I have a lot to learn from you.....
Cheers
Shantanu