A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Featured Equipment Deals

Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Lens Review Read More

Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Lens Review

Sigma 18-35mm F1.8: Read why reviewer Rebekah Gough thinks this revolutionary lens is a "a game changer."

Latest Equipment Articles

Lensbaby Spark Review Read More

Lensbaby Spark Review

This inexpensive gadget does indeed spark your creativity. Read on to see how.

Latest Learning Articles

26 Creative Photos of Water Drops Read More

26 Creative Photos of Water Drops

These absolutely amazing macro photographs feature a tiny elemental thing that can hold a lot of mystery. Take a moment to enjoy these photographs of water drops.


People in public places require a release?

Bob Myers , Jul 18, 2003; 12:53 a.m.

If one visits a mall and shoots areas that include people, do you need to get releases from any of them? How about when doing "street shooting?" Or in public buildings/places? I'm talking about the random people who happen to be in the photo *and* can be easily recognized, not people who are positioned there by the photographer.

Responses

Tom Menegatos , Jul 18, 2003; 04:37 a.m.

YOu don't need a release to take a photo in a public place but your intended usage determines if you need a release or not. If you want to use it in an editorial or fine art way you don't need a release. If you are using it in an advertisement or on a commercial product you need a release. These are the general rules.

Jerry Stillwell , Jul 18, 2003; 05:51 a.m.

If you're shooting in a mall, you will almost surely need a property release from the management as well (if you intend to use the images for commercial applications)

peter nelson , Jul 18, 2003; 11:13 a.m.

Good grief - WHY does this confusion come up again and AGAIN?!

A model release is never required to TAKE a photo of someone (although that doesn't mean you don't need permission, since photogs themselves may be banned in some places).

Model releases are about the

USE

of a photo, i.e., where or how it is to be published. Certain uses (e.g., PJ) don't require a release; other ones, (e.g., commercial) do.

As far as a mall goes, a mall is not a public place. Whether you can take pictures there at all is at the pleasure of the mall owners. Ditto with the use of any such images.

Bert Krages , Jul 18, 2003; 11:26 a.m.

Even more confusion. From the legal perspective releases are not required for images of property (except those protected by copyright). Although various property owners such as the Pebble Beach Country Club, New York Stock Exchange, and the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame have filed or threatened lawsuit, none of them prevailed in court (some cases were settled). While a mall owner is generally within its rights to prohibit photography while on its property, you are not required to get a release to either photograph or publish images of the property.

Lee Shively , Jul 26, 2003; 08:29 p.m.

No.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses