A Site for Photographers by Photographers

Community > Forums > Sony/Minolta SLR System > Minolta AF 75-300 4.5 - 5.6...

Featured Equipment Deals

Nikon 24-85mm/f3.5-4.5 AF-S VR Lens Review Read More

Nikon 24-85mm/f3.5-4.5 AF-S VR Lens Review

Photo.net Nikon editor Shun Cheung reviews the new Nikon 24-85mm/f3.5-4.5 AF-S VR Lens lens.

Latest Equipment Articles

Sun Position Tracking Apps Read More

Sun Position Tracking Apps

These 5 apps, ranging in price from free to $8.99, are our top picks for tracking sun (and moon) light. Also ranging in complexity, some help you keep tabs on the ideal lighting of the day while...

Latest Learning Articles

State of the ART: Rag Mama Rag! Read More

State of the ART: Rag Mama Rag!

In his latest exploration, fine art photographer Pete Myers reviews and compares some of the highest quality rag-based photographic papers on the market today.


Minolta AF 75-300 4.5 - 5.6 MACRO

Zvon Saban , Nov 29, 2005; 07:03 p.m.

Hi! Does anybody have experiences with Minolta AF 75-300 4.5 - 5.6 Macro lenses. There seems to be 3 versions I, II and D. On photozone website they have reviews of I and II versions and I is considered much better than II version. There is nothing on the newer D version. Could somebody please shed some light on this subject.

Thanks.

Responses

Michael Hohner , Nov 30, 2005; 05:13 a.m.

Click here to find a list of all Minolta AF lenses: http://www.mhohner.de/minolta/lenses.php?lang=e#zooms.

The first version of the 75-300 has a different optical construction compared to the other versions.

Bill Thorlin , Nov 30, 2005; 05:14 a.m.

Zvon - there are in fact 4 versions going back to the big one of 1986. If you want to check details go to Michael Hohners website - www.mhohner.de - gives you full specification.

I have the D version in the "pretty" silver colour - it is basically a lightweight consumer lens, I guess like the other 2 newer ones with performance to match. The macro function ( 1:4 )is not really true macro more of a selling point claim which is used by most manufacturers to boost the attractiveness of the lens on the market. It does not have the focus hold button that the other 2 have or dof scale like the older one has.

I cannot compare it to the others as I have not used them but I am going to try out an old 70-210 f4 to see if it so much better as many claim and if I need the extra distance I will use a 1.4 or 1.5 TC. Do not know if this will be of any help to you but is does reflect my thinking.

Ivan Dzo , Nov 30, 2005; 10:25 a.m.

Bill, the 70-210 was the last zoom I picked up for 40gbp on ebay. It is hugely better than the 100-300 apo and now my favourite medium zoom for slide usage. On testing, its far better than any zoom i've tested except the 28-135 brute. A bit big but incredible value for money at 10x this price.

Back to top

Notify me of Responses