Pintea Paul Adrian , Nov 20, 2009; 02:42 p.m.
Greetings to photo.net community members.
The story goes like this.This is my work:...www.pinteapauladrian.com
,i want your feedback(bad or good) on it.Plain and simple.
Linda DeGrasse
, Nov 20, 2009; 06:13 p.m.
I like the site, and I like your work. Your gallery takes a little too long to load, but I was really intrigued and wanted to see what you had in there. I'm glad I was patient and waited. The dark and moody images are great, and all of your images seem consistently real. I like the feel of them.
Aside from the slightly long loading time for your gallery, the only thing I would mention is that it wasn't apparent to me at first that I needed to "click" on the photo to move through the images. I was a little confused at first and while moving my mouse around I chanced across the word "click." It wasn't real obvious. Maybe it's me and other people won't find that to be an issue.
I read your bio and it seems that you have made a really good start down that path you mentioned.
Mark M
, Nov 20, 2009; 07:40 p.m.
Nice work. It's honest and easy to use. Like Linda, I found it a little slow to load, but not so bad that I was ready to give up
at any point. From a practical point of view, you may find yourself wanting to attract search engines in the future and may
want to get some of the text in a format they can read. This of course is a compromise because your typography works
really well and it would be quite difficult to reproduce in a search engine friendly way. I enjoyed your work, you left me
wanting more.
Pintea Paul Adrian , Nov 21, 2009; 04:18 a.m.
Thanks you both for the encouraging words,i will try to improve the loading times .I am allready working on indexing the flash content. There will be more Mark.
Dan South
, Nov 25, 2009; 03:40 a.m.
Great photos, and that's what counts!
sowmya parthasarathy , Nov 25, 2009; 07:24 a.m.
Great work and a great site. The loading time isn't so bad. It could be faster, but doesn't annoy the user. Considering that I just worked on my site, the only potential issue is that, since its a flash site, the indexing on search engines isn't all that great. You could parallely have a photo blog and link your site to that to optimise your search results. Otherwise its Perfect.
Pintea Paul Adrian , Nov 25, 2009; 12:04 p.m.
That's very encouraging and very good ideea with a photoblog,linking back to my website,altough i heard google works now with macromedia on the issue of extracting text/links from swf. files.
StefON StefON , Dec 04, 2009; 08:22 a.m.
I will not comment on the image quality, wich is quite good.
When using a wireless connection the gallery take way to much time to load,
as suggested earlier, you may want to add an html splash page, possibly linking to a blog...
...because google is just starting to work on indexing flash content, and right now it's bad.
Also, if the purpose of your site is to eventually gain customers, I would recommend you to create galleries matching the photographic range you want to cover...
Otherwise, I like the design and the font.
Pintea Paul Adrian , Dec 04, 2009; 11:32 a.m.
Thanks Stefon...at the moment i am redesigning the gallery to hold more categories.That will be online,when i will have a richer portofolio.I'll keep photography as a passion,but if there will be some side projects from which i can make some extra money,that will be a nice thing.
Cheers.
Mark Anderson , Dec 04, 2009; 01:55 p.m.
Like the simplicity and your portfolio. Font and sizing was good out of explorer. Maybe (just personally) would use a slideshow rather than clicking on each image. Nice work. Good luck
Pintea Paul Adrian , Dec 04, 2009; 04:17 p.m.
I just wanted to mantain the simplicity of the gallery.Solely from this reason i gave up on buttons ......At next revision of the gallery component,i'll test how two buttons(previous,next) will look and feel.
Pintea Paul Adrian , Dec 04, 2009; 04:17 p.m.
Ps:bookmark the web adress..:)